Matt Legend Gemmell Modesty is Lying

Mac OS X Cocoa and iPhone Development Services available at Instinctive Code.
Mac OS X Cocoa and iPhone Developer for hire

Other Pages

Categories

Posted
27 November 2007 @ 8pm

Categories
Tech

Tags
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Amazon Kindle

So much has already been said about the Kindle, but I wanted to offer my own thoughts. It’s just how I am.

First off, let me state two things for the record:

  1. I have never owned an electronic book reader device.
  2. I’ve probably wanted one since before I was capable of articulating the thought.

Is the Kindle the device I’m after? No, but then it’s not even the same type of device in the first place. The Kindle isn’t intended to be a replacement for physical books, nor is it even intended as a new, electronic way to read books. It’s a new, electronic way to buy and read books. In that capacity, it does reasonably well - wireless access to Amazon from anywhere with a cellphone signal is a pretty impressive feat, especially for a flat fee. But, of course, therein lies the rub.

What people like myself are looking for is essentially a way to own a single physical book which can contain the text of many logical books. One oblong slab in my pocket or my jacket or my bag, but it contains the text of whatever work I’m reading at the time. By necessity, this slab must then be an electronic device, and at this point we enter into compromises and trade-offs involving some very common factors:

  • Cost vs battery life
  • Cost vs screen resolution and technology
  • Cost vs storage capacity
  • Storage capacity and battery life vs portability (in the form of size and weight)
  • Interface considerations vs cost (on-screen keyboards make the screen hardware much more expensive)
  • Interface considerations vs portability (physical keyboards take up a lot of space on a device, as shown by Kindle)
  • Ability to provide comprehensive access to the service vs unit cost of the device and the electronic books

The fact is that electronic books are compromises. We’re gaining switchable content by sacrificing, to varying degrees, robustness, portability, cost, readability, instant-on capability, limitless “power supply”, weight, universality, the ability to doodle and annotate, resistance to sunblock and indeed long-term exposure to the sun itself, and so on. Anyone complaining that the Kindle doesn’t tick all the boxes which a paper book does in those regards isn’t really paying attention, nor will they probably ever be satisfied. Picard still read his Shakespeare from an actual book, after all, even though his desk was perpetually littered with PADDs.

I don’t blame Amazon in the least for tying the Kindle to their own ebooks and store; indeed, it would be wildly irresponsible of them not to. They’re trying to appeal to a market which is outspoken in eagerness but exceptionally reluctant to actually adopt technologies. It’s a risky venture, and the Amazon crown jewel is its catalogue, which should be leveraged in every possible way.

So I don’t blame them for the nature of the device, but if you’re like me then it’s likely not the kind of device you want. I don’t need a store or wireless access or a built-in keyboard. I’ll even happily sacrifice searching and annotations if it’ll keep the cost down (less important) and make the whole device just be one big screen with a thin casing of plastic around it (much more important).

The fact that the ergonomics and form-factor of the Kindle seem both over-designed and questionable is another valid point, but not the central thrust of this post. The Kindle is a relatively misguided electronic book in the key areas of device transparency (as Bezos puts it) and the elusive quality of “bookness”, but it’s an interesting attempt at a ubiquitous electronic bookstore with potentially the best catalogue ever seen. Don’t dismiss it out of hand because it isn’t an e-paperback.

But, of course, don’t buy it unless it’s actually what you want either. For my money, I want something that says Book to me a lot more than the Kindle does, and with improved industrial design. Give me that and I’ll willingly pay a couple of hundred quid (around 16.8 million US$ currently). I’ll even promise to keep it safe from crayons and coffee and sunblock.

Until then, if you’re desperate for an electronic book-reader, albeit one with somewhat reduced sharpness of text and a battery-life in the teens of hours rather than several dozens, I have a humble suggestion. It even has facing pages.

Picture of a Nintendo DS Lite sitting atop a copy of Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, by Jules Verne

Just pop a flash card like the R4 Revolution or M3DS Simply in there, and voila. You can put your ebooks on the card via USB, along with your ebook reading software of choice, and you’re away.

Oh, and it’ll even let you play Mario.

Disclosure: my fiancée is an Amazon employee, specifically a Java developer. However, she has no involvement whatsoever with the Kindle at time of writing, nor do we currently own stock in the company.

3 Comments

Shane Kamar
29 November 2007 @ 1am

I agree: eBook devices will have to become a LOT more “booky” before the mass market adopts them. The sony eReader has great form and function, but they REFUSE to support devices made by the Holy Apple. If only they’d support Mac… but then, their catalog is not huge either. Amazon is really going somewhere with the Kindle if they’ll make it a little less expensive and a little less ugly.

(BTW, I don’t think our dollar is THAT weak, Matt…)


Stefan Pich
29 November 2007 @ 1pm

The Kindle isn’t what I’m looking for either, but it’s a major step in the right direction (if only they had let Apple’s design teams loose with the interface and industrial design we would be even closer to the paradigm shift).

I agree that, for the foreseeable future, books especially good ones, are going to be impossible to be bettered (although House of Leaves might be even better with an electronic makeover).

But that’s not the point

The Kindle (just like the first ipod) is a really good opening step that will kickstart a revolution. When it’s on iteration 5 (a new one every eighteen months?) it will be the thing to have.

As it stands now (apart from the fact it won’t work in the UK yet). I am still tempted despite the “flaws”. Imagine being able to liberate the space taken up by your library, only keeping your favourites and special books (which usually cost fortunes despite what Waterstones say) to hand.

Then there’s the price.

With the exchange rate at an away-day inducing level, 10USD for a book seems like a bargain to me. The savings on books would soon recoup the cost of the Kindle itself. I’m also not the sort of person who reads one book or magazine at a time and to carry around half a dozen paperbacks and hardbacks is a right faff. With a Kindle pub quizzes are going to be easy.


Alex
2 December 2007 @ 7pm

I have to agree with you on the use of a DSLite as an ebook reader- although it’s completely impractical on my DSPhat, which is a shame.

Unfortunately I haven’t been able to find a good homebrew ebook reader for the nds, is there a good one which you use?


Leave a Comment

Irate Scotsman Hierarchical folders in the Leopard Dock with Quay