<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What have you tried?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried</link>
	<description>Modesty is Lying</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:56:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: papua guinea</title>
		<link>http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/comment-page-2#comment-42228</link>
		<dc:creator>papua guinea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattgemmell.com/?p=1029#comment-42228</guid>
		<description>Nice article!

By the way, I wonder if someone could give me the C++ code for automagically clean this kind of article from my google searches. Send it to my email as soon as possible &gt;D

Oh, and make me a coffee, I feel sleepy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article!</p>
<p>By the way, I wonder if someone could give me the C++ code for automagically clean this kind of article from my google searches. Send it to my email as soon as possible &gt;D</p>
<p>Oh, and make me a coffee, I feel sleepy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bracken &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Learning to Code</title>
		<link>http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/comment-page-2#comment-42090</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bracken &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Learning to Code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattgemmell.com/?p=1029#comment-42090</guid>
		<description>[...] have said this better myself.  You can leave a comment or a trackback from your own site.  Comment on this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have said this better myself.  You can leave a comment or a trackback from your own site.  Comment on this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faust_Reet</title>
		<link>http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/comment-page-2#comment-41944</link>
		<dc:creator>Faust_Reet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattgemmell.com/?p=1029#comment-41944</guid>
		<description>Hi. I&#039;m a totally newbie at game programing, and i&#039;ve been studying computer engineering for 3 years (and a few more to go yet). I find your article really interesting, and it helped me to kind of... you know, sort things into my mind (i don&#039;t know if thats the expression, sorry). Anyway, the thing is you took your time just to give a really nice advice to people like me, and i feel relieved that there is still people like you out in the net. 
Thank you very much for your work sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I&#8217;m a totally newbie at game programing, and i&#8217;ve been studying computer engineering for 3 years (and a few more to go yet). I find your article really interesting, and it helped me to kind of&#8230; you know, sort things into my mind (i don&#8217;t know if thats the expression, sorry). Anyway, the thing is you took your time just to give a really nice advice to people like me, and i feel relieved that there is still people like you out in the net.<br />
Thank you very much for your work sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jan otte</title>
		<link>http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/comment-page-2#comment-41908</link>
		<dc:creator>jan otte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattgemmell.com/?p=1029#comment-41908</guid>
		<description>If you knew what you spoke of this would be of concern.

However it is clear you know nothing of the person who you are criticising so it signifies less than the barking of  hungry dog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you knew what you spoke of this would be of concern.</p>
<p>However it is clear you know nothing of the person who you are criticising so it signifies less than the barking of  hungry dog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jan otte</title>
		<link>http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/comment-page-2#comment-41907</link>
		<dc:creator>jan otte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattgemmell.com/?p=1029#comment-41907</guid>
		<description>So you believe that everyone should assume that everyone who asks a &quot;silly question&quot; should, 100% of the time, be assumed to have already tried to research the problem themselves?

And this should even apply to people who have repeatedly shown that they abuse the privilege?

I don&#039;t think you believe that even though that&#039;s how your posting reads.

The article is simply suggesting that someone like your good self who has put in some hard yards say that up front in making your request.

Stop asking others to assume you are a good person who is doing things the right way. Instead of that remember you are asking for the kindness of strangers and put the evidence of your bona fides on the table for all to see. Not only does that immediately remove you from the group being spoken of in this article it also serves as a good example to others about how to ask a question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you believe that everyone should assume that everyone who asks a &#8220;silly question&#8221; should, 100% of the time, be assumed to have already tried to research the problem themselves?</p>
<p>And this should even apply to people who have repeatedly shown that they abuse the privilege?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you believe that even though that&#8217;s how your posting reads.</p>
<p>The article is simply suggesting that someone like your good self who has put in some hard yards say that up front in making your request.</p>
<p>Stop asking others to assume you are a good person who is doing things the right way. Instead of that remember you are asking for the kindness of strangers and put the evidence of your bona fides on the table for all to see. Not only does that immediately remove you from the group being spoken of in this article it also serves as a good example to others about how to ask a question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jan otte</title>
		<link>http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/comment-page-2#comment-41906</link>
		<dc:creator>jan otte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattgemmell.com/?p=1029#comment-41906</guid>
		<description>You couldn&#039;t have got it more wrong Benjamin.

Read the article again.

And if you think &quot;learning by example&quot; does not include presenting one&#039;s own efforts to be critiqued then you simply don&#039;t understand what the phrase means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You couldn&#8217;t have got it more wrong Benjamin.</p>
<p>Read the article again.</p>
<p>And if you think &#8220;learning by example&#8221; does not include presenting one&#8217;s own efforts to be critiqued then you simply don&#8217;t understand what the phrase means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Weatherby II</title>
		<link>http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/comment-page-2#comment-41442</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Weatherby II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 06:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattgemmell.com/?p=1029#comment-41442</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  I don&#039;t program anything Apple, and I don&#039;t know about cocoa, but I&#039;m a programmer.

I spend hours looking up a subject in google and where ever else I can find.  I try looking up in documentation, I try different things in my code (sometimes, I want to be honest here, sometimes I&#039;m just sick of working with my non-working code).  Finally I go into chat and ask.  The first reply I usually get is a flippant &quot;google it&quot; or &quot;rtfm&quot; or some such.  I almost always google it first.

Another situation, I need to figure out how to do something, I&#039;ve tried a lot of different things and looked up stuff that didn&#039;t turn up anything (this happens a lot of the time, googling but not finding anything because you somehow don&#039;t have the right combination of magic words that will summon your solution out of thin air, remember old text adventures, where you had to put in the exact word or it didn&#039;t know what you were talking about?)  So I go into chat like the above and ask my question, and show my code.  This time it&#039;s like &quot;Why are you doing it that way, why aren&#039;t you using lists?  Why not use this library or api, etc, etc...  All I wanted was a little answer to my question, you don&#039;t even have to give me code, all you have to do is link me somewhere that explains it.  

Or how about this I&#039;m trying to figure out how to do something, i&#039;ve done the prescribed searching.  So I&#039;m discussing in a chatroom about different ways to do something, and guess what someone is actually trying to be nice and trying to help.  They tell me one thing, I ask them another, they try to explain it again, i ask them about a certain aspect.  Little do they realize that I&#039;m just not getting it.  They assume I already know stuff or whatever.  Sometimes people are just slow, like me.  I&#039;m slow, it takes me forever to do something.  And guess what sometimes I can&#039;t remember something I did 6 months ago even when looking at code, even when commenting.

And why do you assume I want to learn something specific?  Maybe I just want a quick code snippet because it should be simpler than the awful mess I&#039;ve made for myself.  Maybe you can do in a few minutes what it takes me hours to even being to start on?

You want me to respect you by going through all the effort of trying to figure it out on my own, and generally wanting help, then you need to respect me in the fact that I&#039;ve actually done that, and not assume because I asked a silly question I wasn&#039;t industrious enough for your tastes.  He didn&#039;t jump through the ring of fire, so he doesn&#039;t get help on learning to ride...

The best thing you can do if you don&#039;t want to help is just not answer me, don&#039;t go through the trouble of insulting me because I wasn&#039;t up to your standards.  If someone asks you for code just delete.  If he pesters you tell him you don&#039;t give out code, and not to mail you.  If he still pesters you put him on your spam list and don&#039;t even look at the email.

Sorry if I&#039;m the a-hole on this thread, it&#039;s stressful enough to try to keep up with all the trends and all the proper ways to do something, without someone being snooty and not telling you that there&#039;s a reason for a specific way of doing something that you&#039;re not doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I don&#8217;t program anything Apple, and I don&#8217;t know about cocoa, but I&#8217;m a programmer.</p>
<p>I spend hours looking up a subject in google and where ever else I can find.  I try looking up in documentation, I try different things in my code (sometimes, I want to be honest here, sometimes I&#8217;m just sick of working with my non-working code).  Finally I go into chat and ask.  The first reply I usually get is a flippant &#8220;google it&#8221; or &#8220;rtfm&#8221; or some such.  I almost always google it first.</p>
<p>Another situation, I need to figure out how to do something, I&#8217;ve tried a lot of different things and looked up stuff that didn&#8217;t turn up anything (this happens a lot of the time, googling but not finding anything because you somehow don&#8217;t have the right combination of magic words that will summon your solution out of thin air, remember old text adventures, where you had to put in the exact word or it didn&#8217;t know what you were talking about?)  So I go into chat like the above and ask my question, and show my code.  This time it&#8217;s like &#8220;Why are you doing it that way, why aren&#8217;t you using lists?  Why not use this library or api, etc, etc&#8230;  All I wanted was a little answer to my question, you don&#8217;t even have to give me code, all you have to do is link me somewhere that explains it.  </p>
<p>Or how about this I&#8217;m trying to figure out how to do something, i&#8217;ve done the prescribed searching.  So I&#8217;m discussing in a chatroom about different ways to do something, and guess what someone is actually trying to be nice and trying to help.  They tell me one thing, I ask them another, they try to explain it again, i ask them about a certain aspect.  Little do they realize that I&#8217;m just not getting it.  They assume I already know stuff or whatever.  Sometimes people are just slow, like me.  I&#8217;m slow, it takes me forever to do something.  And guess what sometimes I can&#8217;t remember something I did 6 months ago even when looking at code, even when commenting.</p>
<p>And why do you assume I want to learn something specific?  Maybe I just want a quick code snippet because it should be simpler than the awful mess I&#8217;ve made for myself.  Maybe you can do in a few minutes what it takes me hours to even being to start on?</p>
<p>You want me to respect you by going through all the effort of trying to figure it out on my own, and generally wanting help, then you need to respect me in the fact that I&#8217;ve actually done that, and not assume because I asked a silly question I wasn&#8217;t industrious enough for your tastes.  He didn&#8217;t jump through the ring of fire, so he doesn&#8217;t get help on learning to ride&#8230;</p>
<p>The best thing you can do if you don&#8217;t want to help is just not answer me, don&#8217;t go through the trouble of insulting me because I wasn&#8217;t up to your standards.  If someone asks you for code just delete.  If he pesters you tell him you don&#8217;t give out code, and not to mail you.  If he still pesters you put him on your spam list and don&#8217;t even look at the email.</p>
<p>Sorry if I&#8217;m the a-hole on this thread, it&#8217;s stressful enough to try to keep up with all the trends and all the proper ways to do something, without someone being snooty and not telling you that there&#8217;s a reason for a specific way of doing something that you&#8217;re not doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RSJames</title>
		<link>http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/comment-page-2#comment-41167</link>
		<dc:creator>RSJames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattgemmell.com/?p=1029#comment-41167</guid>
		<description>This brings to mind something I did in college.  It happened fairly recently (that is “recently” in a geological time frame…):  I was given a programming assignment in a Pascal class to develop and implement an algorithm to “partition” a number, preferably using recursion.  I didn’t feel like using recursion, and was curious if someone else had already done the algorithm.  Here is what I did:
1.	Walked to the library.
2.	Thought up a likely sounding subject.  Found the drawer in the card catalog where the subject was listed (alphabetically).  (This was the newer, engineering, library, with a nondescript card catalog.  The older library had gorgeous oak cabinets.  But I digress…)
3.	Tried another subject or two.  Eventually found a card for a promising sounding book.  Wrote down the title and call number.  Got a few more titles in case the first book didn’t have what I needed.  
4.	Went upstairs to the stacks.  Using the Dewey Decimal number, found the appropriate shelf.  Read titles ‘till I found the book I wanted.  
5.	Looked up the subject in the index of the book, and then went to the appropriate page.
6.	Started reading and Bingo!  Not just one, but three pseudo-code version of algorithms for the problem.  
7.	Photocopied the pages.  Good thing I had enough change in my pocket to use the photocopier.  
8.	Walked across the street to the building that had the terminals for the DEC-20 computer.  Logged on and started translating the pseudo-code into Pascal.  Response time was good, only a few seconds per line, so it went fast.  Was glad I was using Pascal on a terminal instead of having to punch cards for the FORTRAN system.  Ran the program in batch mode (there was no other choice.)  Debugged.  Reran.  Repeat.  Finally printed out the program and results on green and white paper.
9.	Handed in my printout in class.

Total time, about 2 ½ hours.  And I was able to brag to my classmates about the great shortcut I had taken on the assignment, and it WAS a big timesaver.  

Do any of the steps above seem familiar to you?  How many of you even know what a card catalog is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This brings to mind something I did in college.  It happened fairly recently (that is “recently” in a geological time frame…):  I was given a programming assignment in a Pascal class to develop and implement an algorithm to “partition” a number, preferably using recursion.  I didn’t feel like using recursion, and was curious if someone else had already done the algorithm.  Here is what I did:<br />
1.	Walked to the library.<br />
2.	Thought up a likely sounding subject.  Found the drawer in the card catalog where the subject was listed (alphabetically).  (This was the newer, engineering, library, with a nondescript card catalog.  The older library had gorgeous oak cabinets.  But I digress…)<br />
3.	Tried another subject or two.  Eventually found a card for a promising sounding book.  Wrote down the title and call number.  Got a few more titles in case the first book didn’t have what I needed.<br />
4.	Went upstairs to the stacks.  Using the Dewey Decimal number, found the appropriate shelf.  Read titles ‘till I found the book I wanted.<br />
5.	Looked up the subject in the index of the book, and then went to the appropriate page.<br />
6.	Started reading and Bingo!  Not just one, but three pseudo-code version of algorithms for the problem.<br />
7.	Photocopied the pages.  Good thing I had enough change in my pocket to use the photocopier.<br />
8.	Walked across the street to the building that had the terminals for the DEC-20 computer.  Logged on and started translating the pseudo-code into Pascal.  Response time was good, only a few seconds per line, so it went fast.  Was glad I was using Pascal on a terminal instead of having to punch cards for the FORTRAN system.  Ran the program in batch mode (there was no other choice.)  Debugged.  Reran.  Repeat.  Finally printed out the program and results on green and white paper.<br />
9.	Handed in my printout in class.</p>
<p>Total time, about 2 ½ hours.  And I was able to brag to my classmates about the great shortcut I had taken on the assignment, and it WAS a big timesaver.  </p>
<p>Do any of the steps above seem familiar to you?  How many of you even know what a card catalog is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darel</title>
		<link>http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/comment-page-2#comment-41160</link>
		<dc:creator>darel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattgemmell.com/?p=1029#comment-41160</guid>
		<description>hence why it&#039;d probably be impossible to pinpoint when rtfm was first quoted.. this has to be a problem since the beginning of time.  its called laziness i believe :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hence why it&#8217;d probably be impossible to pinpoint when rtfm was first quoted.. this has to be a problem since the beginning of time.  its called laziness i believe :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jelahd</title>
		<link>http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/comment-page-2#comment-41120</link>
		<dc:creator>Jelahd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattgemmell.com/?p=1029#comment-41120</guid>
		<description>This is a rant by yet another egotistical developer considering himself superior. Another Ego trip for another &quot;me me me&quot; developer. 
What is it with developers and Ego? 
20 yeasr in developement and development management and that has been the one constant. 
It should get its own greek letter. Get out of your own butts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a rant by yet another egotistical developer considering himself superior. Another Ego trip for another &#8220;me me me&#8221; developer.<br />
What is it with developers and Ego?<br />
20 yeasr in developement and development management and that has been the one constant.<br />
It should get its own greek letter. Get out of your own butts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
